The Brilliance of your Work Deserves Equally Brilliant Collaboration
3
Some of the brightest interdisciplinary teams in the world wrestle with a problem they didn’t see coming - working together effectively.
On paper, these teams have it all.
· Deep expertise
· Ambitious goals
· Resources to make breakthroughs
·
And yet, when the pressure’s on, conversations get tense, trust erodes, and the group’s potential is left on the table.
Why does this happen?
Because collaboration is not instinctive.
It’s a skill — one most of us were never formally taught.
Photo credit: Vitaly Gariev on unsplash
The Hidden Challenge of Collaboration
When teams hit roadblocks, the usual explanation is “communication issues.”
And “communication issues” is a catch-all phrase that hides a deeper truth:
Most people have never been taught how to:
Understand what’s really driving their own reactions
Listen deeply enough to understand what’s underneath someone else’s words
Have conversations that move conflicts toward solutions rather than stalemates.
In other words, collaboration falters because teams are operating without a shared framework for how to navigate tough interactions.
Marshall Rosenberg's Work: Makes the Invisible Visible
This is where Marshall Rosenberg, the creator of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), made a profound contribution. Rosenberg believed that behind every nervous laugh, frustration, or tense exchange, there’s something universal at play: human needs.
When we can identify the needs — ours and others’ — that sit beneath conflict, something shifts. The conversation moves away from blame and toward understanding, even when people disagree.
For this to work, people need to be open to receiving these ideas. Researchers and other highly analytical teams, for instance, often pride themselves on logic and precision. At first, the language of “feelings” and “needs” can seem soft or even irrelevant.
Something happens when they see that Rosenberg’s work isn’t about being nice or avoiding conflict. It’s about creating clarity and structure in conversations so that collective intelligence can actually emerge.
The Four Core Elements of Productive Conversations
Rosenberg’s framework boils down to four simple, learnable steps.When applied, they can change the tone and direction of even the most charged discussions.
Observation without evaluation
Stick to facts, not judgments.
Example: “The last two project milestones slipped” instead of “This project is a mess.”
Naming feelings
Express how you’re affected, rather than blaming others.
Example: “I feel anxious and frustrated” vs. “You’re stressing me out.”
Identifying needs
Connect those feelings to the underlying human need.
Example: “I need predictability and shared accountability.”
Making a clear, actionable request
Invite collaboration with a specific next step.
Example: “Would you be willing to discuss what changes might help us stay on track?”
These steps don’t guarantee agreement — but they dramatically increase the odds of being heard and of finding solutions everyone can live with.
An Example in Action
Let’s see how this might play out.
Your research team is racing toward a major grant submission. Stress is high, and during a meeting, Jordan, a senior member of the team, blurts out: “This project is a mess. Nobody respects deadlines or quality anymore!” The room goes silent. Casey, the project lead, replies calmly and defensively: “That’s not true. Maybe if everyone pulled their weight, we wouldn’t be behind.” Then, the exchange spirals. Jordan doubles down. Casey gets frustrated. Others retreat into silence.
Now, let’s rewind.
What if Jordan had used Rosenberg’s four-step structure instead? “When the last two milestones slipped, I felt anxious and frustrated because I need predictability and shared accountability. Would you be willing to talk about what support or changes might help us stay on track?”
The difference is subtle but profound:
Casey doesn’t feel personally attacked.
Other team members feel safer to speak up.
The group shifts from blame mode → problem-solving mode.
Even if the issue isn’t fully resolved, the team starts to rebuild trust and shared focus.
Practical First Steps for Your Team
Introducing a whole new framework can feel overwhelming, especially for busy teams. Here are a few simple practices to experiment with — no training required:
1. One-Word Check-In
At the start of meetings, each person shares a single word about how they’re feeling.Example: “Focused,” “Overwhelmed,” “Excited.”This takes less than a minute and surfaces tension before it derails the conversation.
2. Practice Observation Without Judgment
In your next conversation, focus purely on what you see or hear, leaving out interpretation.Example:
Instead of “You’re always late to meetings,”
Try “You arrived after the meeting started for the last three weeks. It is causing some coordination challenges for the team.. Can we talk about it and explore how we can collectively address the challenge?”
3. End with a Clear Request
Before wrapping up a meeting, confirm exactly what will happen next, by whom, and by when.Example:
Vague: “We need to communicate better.”
Clear: “Let’s schedule a 15-minute Friday check-in for project updates. Will that work for everyone?”
4. Pause and Identify the Need
When you notice your frustration rising, ask yourself:
“What need might be behind this reaction — mine or theirs?”
This simple reflection can transform how you listen and respond.
Building Brilliant Collaboration, One Conversation at a Time
Brilliant teams don’t struggle with collaboration because they lack talent or dedication. They falter because navigating human dynamics is a skill set — one most of us never learned.
Marshall Rosenberg gives us a map for these messy, high-stakes conversations. When teams are open to practicing his ideas, even a little, they unlock not just smoother communication but true collaboration:
Conflicts get addressed early and constructively.
Meetings feel purposeful rather than draining.
Innovation emerges from genuine dialogue, not power struggles.
The brilliance of your work deserves equally brilliant collaboration.
Start with one small experiment this week — a check-in, a reframed observation, a clearer request. Notice what happens. Change begins not with grand declarations, but with small intentional, courageous conversations at the earliest sign of a need.
